icon-account icon-glass

Popular Products

The Lean Protein
Whey protein powder for weight-loss.

These Are The Best Low-Calorie Alcoholic Drinks

22nd December 2020

22nd December 2020

By Shivraj Bassi

The festive season is upon us, and we all know what that means. Your workout regime goes out the window and in comes the booze, roast potatoes and Quality Street. But just because you want to toast your successful year (or forget the memories of your bad one) with a drink or two doesn’t mean you have to completely derail your progress and wake up with a sugar hangover that could fell a horse. 

The calories in different kinds of alcoholic drinks can vary hugely, depending on if you’re drinking a pina colada, a glass of wine or a whisky on ice. Knowing what’s in the cocktail shaker could make the difference between returning to work in January with a beer belly and ending the year on a fitness high. Just because you’re looking to limit unnecessary calorie intake doesn’t mean you have to turn down a celebratory drink altogether - you just have to be smart about it. 

The best way to do this is to opt for spirits, wine and beer with as few frills and extras as possible. Each shot of spirit ranges from 60 to 100 calories, and it’s the mixers which can really up the calorie count. Premade cocktails tend to have high sugar levels, a pint of beer is equivalent to a slice of pepperoni pizza, calorie-wise, and a glass of white wine has around the same number of calories as a doughnut. Although you might be sipping these calories rather than chewing them, they very much count towards your daily total and come with none of the vitamins and nutrients of when you eat real, nutritious food. 

Photo by Jia Jia Shum on Unsplash

Luckily, we know how you can enjoy a few drinks without wrecking your diet. Clear drinks are the way to go, such as spirits with soda, wine, champagne and light beers. Avoid juices, sugary mixers such as fizzy drinks, energy drinks and tonic water. 

If you’re a die-hard fan of fruity cocktails such as a strawberry daiquiri, consider making your own, which puts you in control of the sugar content and means you can add more fruit, which basically turns the drink into a fruit salad. Or add flavour in a way that doesn’t add calories, such as fresh herbs, fresh ginger and other flavourings. 

Whatever you’re drinking, the most important thing is to stay hydrated. A good rule of thumb is drink a glass of water for every drink you consume, as well as making a concerted effort to drink plenty of water during the day if you’re knowing you’re probably going to be having a wild one that night. This is especially true if you’re exercising, as you’ll be losing extra water to sweat. 

These are the best low-calories drinks to order or make at home. 

Vodka soda

It’s a classic for a reason.  Around 65 calories per shot, vodka is one of the lowest calorie spirits out there and soda water is calorie-free. When you compare this to a gin and tonic, which comes in at around 200 calories for both gin and mixer, you’re sitting pretty. We would definitely advise adding some slices of fresh lime to this drink for flavour, but you could also add a splash or two or cranberry juice or pineapple juice if you don’t mind a small amount of sugar and want to make it even more delicious. 

Red wine

With around 100 calories for a 150ml glass, red wine isn’t the lowest calorie drink out there but it makes up for this with health benefits including polyphenols, which help to reduce inflammation in the body. Red wine may also be good for gut health, which can improve digestion and immunity and make it easier to stay at a healthy weight. If you’re worried about not being able to stop after a glass or two, split a bottle with a friend so you know that when the bottle is done, you’ve hit your limit. 

Mojito

A margarita might be the best thing to drink with Mexican food, but it’s packed with sugar. A mojito, on the other hand, is a surprisingly light cocktail - especially if you’re making it yourself. A combination of soda water, mint, rum and lime, if you go easy on the added sugar then the whole drink runs to around 100 calories. 

Light beer

Sometimes you just want a beer. And as long as you don’t reach for one that has a high alcohol by volume (ABV) ratio, you’re good to go. A Corona Light has 99 calories, a Budweiser Select has 55 calories and a pint of Guinness has 125. Bottoms up.

Anything on the rocks

Not only is drinking tequila, rum or whisky on the rocks (or with a splash of water - either will do) a very chic attribute to have, it’s also one of the best things to drink when you’re looking for a low calorie way to celebrate. Rather than having a spirit with a sugary mixer, you’re getting a drink with a similar flavour profile that you’re far more likely to sip slowly, which will mean you’ll drink less and ingest less sugar. 

Champagne cocktail

Nothing says Christmas like a champagne cocktail - and it’s a drink which is surprisingly low in calories. Composed of a sugar cube sprinkled with bitters, topped off with champagne then given a citrus twist, you can add a drop of brandy or Triple Sec if you want to spice things up. Delicious, festive and stylish, it might just be the ideal Christmas tipple. 

Need Expert Advice?

Other Insights

What Happened To My Training Over Summer (Honestly)
I did not train well this summer. A holiday to spend time with my family, a run of work trips, a couple of injuries I was trying to cope with (left shoulder and right forearm for those who are interested). If you'd asked me in June how consistent I'd be over the summer, I'd have said very. I was wrong. Most people quietly assume the founder of a wellness brand has this figured out. The truth is I run a brand, I try to have a life outside it, and summer is the season where routine goes to die for almost everyone I know. I don't think that's a personal failing. I think it's just what a normal year looks like. What I want to talk about is what actually happens to your body when this happens, because the research here is more reassuring than you might expect. What detraining research actually shows There's a real body of science on this. Strength and cardiovascular fitness don't decline at the same rate, and they don't decline anywhere near as fast as people fear. Cardiovascular fitness is the first thing to soften. Your VO2 max starts drifting down within a couple of weeks of stopping structured training, because your heart and blood vessels adapt to demand quickly in both directions. Strength is a different story. Studies that track people through a few weeks off training consistently find that measurable strength loss is small, often barely noticeable, for the first three to four weeks. The muscle itself takes even longer to shrink in any meaningful way. Several studies looking specifically at detraining periods found that visible loss of muscle protein and structure often doesn't show up until somewhere between five and eight months without any training at all. A summer of patchy sessions is nowhere near that. The reassuring partThe part I find genuinely reassuring is what's called muscle memory, and it's not just a phrase people use to feel better about a break. When you train, your muscle cells add nuclei, essentially more control centres for building protein. Research shows those nuclei stick around for months after you stop training, well past the point where the muscle itself has started to shrink. When you come back, you're not starting from zero. You're reactivating machinery that never actually left. That's a large part of why people who return to training after a long break tend to regain lost strength and size far faster than it took to build in the first place, often within four to eight weeks depending on how long the layoff was. Some of you might remember this happening post-Covid. So if you had a summer like mine, the honest scientific answer is that you probably lost less than it feels like, and you'll get it back faster than you think. What I'm actually doing this month Nothing dramatic. I'm not doing a reset week or a punishing comeback programme. I'm just going back to five structured sessions a week, prioritising the compound lifts I know well, and being honest that the first couple of sessions will feel harder than they did in June.  Don’t forget your proteinThe other thing I'm paying more attention to is protein, simply because it's the one lever that makes the rebuilding phase more efficient. Adequate protein intake supports the muscle protein synthesis that's doing the actual work of restoring what softened over summer. I've been leaning on The Health Protein for this. It's plant-based, built around pea and brown rice protein for a full amino acid profile, with glutamine in there to support recovery. If you'd rather stick with a whey based option, that's a completely reasonable choice too, and The Strong Protein remains built for exactly that. If you had a messy summer, you're not behind. You're just at the start of a normal, unremarkable return to routine, and the research says that's a far shorter road back than most people assume. Forward this to anyonre you know who is dreading their first session back. I'd genuinely like to know what generally works for you post-summer. Structured plan, just showing up once, anything. Reply and tell me. Even if it’s a one-liner, I’d love to hear from you. Read more
The Glow Blend: A Confession
I need to tell you something I've never said publicly, and it's not flattering. When our product team first brought me a plan for a collagen supplement, my honest reaction was no. Not "let me think about it." A flat no. And if I'm being fully honest about why, it wasn't the science. It was that collagen felt, in my head, like a beauty category. Something for someone else's brand. Not ours. I built Innermost around performance and evidence. Protein, creatine, mushrooms, electrolytes. Things I could point to a study for and feel comfortable talking about at a dinner table full of people who workout regularly. Collagen sat in a different mental folder. Skincare aisle. Jars with gold lids and brand sponsorship by one of the Kardashians. I'd absorbed a version of what "beauty" meant without ever examining it. The argument in the room So we had the argument internally. A proper one. A few people on the team pushed back hard, and rightly so. One of them put it to me plainly: we started Innermost to follow the evidence wherever it goes, not to follow it everywhere except the places that feel awkward. That line stuck with me. Here's what changed my mind, and it wasn't a feeling. It was the research. What the evidence actually says Collagen is the most abundant protein in your body. It's structural, it's in your skin, your joints, your gut lining, and production declines steadily from your mid-twenties onward. That's not a marketing claim, that's basic physiology. The question was never whether collagen matters. It was whether supplementing it actually does anything, and that's where most of the category falls apart. Most collagen products on the market use whole collagen molecules, which are too large to be absorbed effectively when you drink them. The ones that do use hydrolysed peptides, which are broken down into smaller chains your body can actually take up, still run into a second problem: dose. A lot of labels list collagen content that sits well below the 2 to 10 grams used in the trials that show measurable effects on skin elasticity and hydration. You're paying for a placebo with good branding. The ingredient most brands leave out The third problem is the one that convinced me completely. Vitamin C isn't a nice-to-have alongside collagen. It's a required co-factor for your body to actually synthesise collagen at the cellular level. Without adequate vitamin C, the enzymes responsible for stabilising collagen structure don't function properly. You can take a perfectly dosed hydrolysed peptide and still get a fraction of the benefit if the product doesn't include enough vitamin C alongside it. Most don't. They sell you the raw material and leave out the one thing your body needs to use it. Once I saw the category clearly, laid out like that, the decision stopped being about how I felt and started being about what the evidence supported. That's the whole operating principle of Innermost. I couldn't defend saying no to a legitimate, well-evidenced product category. What we built So we built The Glow Blend properly. Hydrolysed collagen peptides at a dose that reflects the research, alongside vitamin C, hyaluronic acid for hydration, biotin and folic acid for hair and nail health. Nothing in it that doesn't earn its place. What surprised me after launch The part I didn't expect was the response once we launched it. A good number of the messages came from women, as you'd expect, and they were generous and specific about what they'd noticed. But a surprising number came from men. Customers writing in to say they'd felt exactly what I'd felt, that awkward little flinch at "collagen," and had quietly bought it anyway because the ingredient breakdown made sense to them. That response told me more about why this category needed an honest voice in it than any research paper did. I'm not going to pretend I have this fully figured out. I still catch myself, occasionally, hesitating slightly before I mention it in a room. Old habits sit deeper than good evidence sometimes. But I take it, and increasingly a lot of men I respect take it too, quietly, without needing to make a thing of it. If this sounds familiar If any part of this resonated, and you've felt that same small resistance to a category you assumed wasn't for you, hit reply and tell me. I'd genuinely like to know I'm not the only one who had to get over it. And if you know someone, a friend, a partner, who could use this exact reasoning rather than a tesimonial, forward it on. It might do more good coming from someone else's honesty. Read more