icon-account icon-glass

Popular Products

The Lean Protein
Whey protein powder for weight-loss.
The Energy Booster
Pre/intra-workout powder with BCAAs.

The Ingredient We Almost Didn't Put In The Energy Booster

30th March 2026

30th March 2026

By Shivraj Bassi

There's a question we ask about every ingredient before it goes into a product.
 
Not "is this trending?" Not "does it look good on the label?" Just: does the evidence actually support putting this in?
 
Most of the time, that question is straightforward. Either the research is there or it isn't. But occasionally you land on an ingredient where the science says yes and something else gives you pause. That's where formulation gets genuinely interesting.
 
Beta alanine was one of those decisions.
 
What Beta Alanine Actually Does
 
Most people who've taken a pre-workout have felt beta alanine without knowing it. It's the ingredient responsible for the tingling sensation you get in your face, your neck, your hands.
 
That feeling has a name: paraesthesia. It's harmless. But it's also the reason we nearly left beta alanine out.
 
Before I get to that, the science.
 
Beta alanine is a non-essential amino acid. On its own, it doesn't do very much. But inside muscle tissue, it binds with another amino acid called histidine to form something called carnosine. And carnosine is where the real work happens.
 
During intense exercise, your muscles produce hydrogen ions as a byproduct of energy production. It's the build-up of those hydrogen ions, not lactic acid as most people think, that causes the burning sensation and the drop-off in performance. Carnosine acts as a buffer. It mops up those hydrogen ions and delays the point at which fatigue kicks in.
 
The research on this is substantial. A 2012 meta-analysis published in the journal Amino Acids, covering over 40 studies, found that beta alanine supplementation consistently improved exercise capacity, particularly in high-intensity efforts lasting between one and four minutes. The effect size was meaningful and reproducible. This wasn't a promising pilot study. It was a decade of accumulated evidence pointing in the same direction.
 
In practical terms: more reps before failure. More output before you hit the wall. Sustained performance over a longer window.
 
So why the hesitation?
 
The decision we almost got wrong
 
The tingling.
 
Not because it's dangerous. It isn't. The paraesthesia from beta alanine is a well-understood pharmacological response and there is no evidence of harm at the doses used in supplementation.
 
But we had a real concern: if someone takes The Workout Blend for the first time and feels an unexpected tingling in their face, and nobody told them it was coming, we've just lost their trust. Possibly permanently.
 
The easy path was to leave it out. Plenty of pre-workout formulas do exactly that, either because they're being cautious or because they want a smoother consumer experience. No ingredient, no explanation required.
 
We talked about it a lot. And the conclusion we kept coming back to was this: removing an ingredient with strong evidence because it might confuse people is not how we want to make formulation decisions. That's the same logic that leads brands to include ingredients with weak evidence because they're more familiar, more comfortable, more sellable.
 
The answer wasn't to remove it. The answer was to be upfront about it.
 
The tingling means the beta alanine is working. It's a real physiological response to a real ingredient doing a real thing. If we believe in the science, we include the ingredient and we explain what's happening. That felt like the right standard to hold ourselves to.
 
What the rest of the market does
 
Most pre-workout formulas fall into one of two categories.
The first is the stimulant-heavy formula. Stacked with caffeine at doses that produce a short spike, a noticeable crash, and not much else underneath.
 
These sell well because the immediate sensation of energy feels like evidence that something is working. It often isn't, not in any meaningful physiological sense beyond what caffeine alone would do.
 
The second is the proprietary blend. A long list of ingredients with no disclosed amounts, making it impossible to know whether any of them are present at doses that match the research. Proprietary blends let brands list an ingredient without committing to a dose that would actually work.
 
Both approaches optimise for perception. Neither optimises for performance.
 
What I'd recommend
 
The Energy Booster (soon to be renamed to The Workout Blend) contains beta alanine alongside citrulline malate, which supports nitric oxide production and blood flow during training, BCAAs at a 2:1:1 ratio to safeguard lean muscle, and natural caffeine from guarana for sustained energy without the spike you get from synthetic sources. The formulation is built around what the research supports at doses that match the evidence.
 
If you feel the tingling the first time you take it, that's the beta alanine. It's normal, it fades within 20 minutes or so, and it's a sign the formula is doing what it's supposed to do.

Product Spotlight

Need Expert Advice?

Other Insights

The Protein Mistake That's Holding Back Your Results
I've written at length about creatine. I've written about collagen, electrolytes, the GLP-1 moment, even the science of sleep. But I've never written a personal email about protein. That's a strange omission for someone who built a brand that makes some pretty ground-breaking protein powders. So let me explain why, and then actually say the thing I've been avoiding. Protein is the most foundational supplement in the Innermost range. It's also the hardest subject for me to write about personally, because there's nothing surprising about it. Creatine had a story. Collagen had a story. Protein is well... protein. Everyone knows you should eat more of it. The mechanism is not a secret. Muscle protein synthesis, leucine threshold, net nitrogen balance. If you've been in the fitness space for more than a couple of years, you've read this before. And I think that's the problem. The familiarity makes people stop paying attention. Here's what I actually think about protein, after a decade of working in this space. Most people in their thirties and forties are under-consuming protein and don't know it. Not by a small amount. The gap between what most people eat and what the research supports for muscle maintenance and body composition outcomes is significant. Studies looking at optimal intake for adults prioritising body composition consistently point to between 1.6 and 2.2 grams per kilogram of bodyweight per day. Most people are eating somewhere between 0.8 and 1.2. The difference is not cosmetic. Adequate protein intake directly affects your ability to preserve muscle tissue during a caloric deficit. It supports recovery between sessions. It has a measurable effect on satiety, which means it influences total caloric intake downstream, not just at the point you consume it. There's a subtler point too, and this is the one I've come to think matters most: protein is the nutrient where consistency compounds most directly. The benefits of creatine saturate over time in a relatively predictable way. Collagen has a timeline that research measures in months. But protein's effect on body composition is essentially continuous. Every day you hit your target, you preserve something. Every day you don't, you lose a small amount of ground. Over a summer, that adds up. This is what I've observed personally, and it's backed by the research on muscle protein turnover. The people who maintain their body composition through summer are not, in my experience, the people who train harder during that period. Most of them train less. Their routines are disrupted. They're travelling. Their eating is less structured. The people who come back in September looking broadly the same as they left in June are the ones who kept their protein intake consistent. That's it. That's the variable. Why I take The Lean Protein I’ve been taking The Lean Protein the past few months for a straightforward reason: the protein-to-calorie ratio. Much like our other protein blends, each serving delivers over 30 grams of protein. The calorie count is low relative to that protein yield. When my training is consistent and my eating is structured, I don't think about this very much. But in the periods when those things are less reliable, that ratio becomes the thing that holds the rest together. The formula also includes acetyl-L-carnitine, inulin, pomegranate extract, and yerba mate. These aren't afterthoughts. Acetyl-L-carnitine has a research base in fat metabolism. Inulin supports satiety and gut function. The pomegranate extract is included for its antioxidant contribution to recovery. This means that the formula does more work per serving than a standard whey and just what I need going into summer. The thing the industry gets wrong about protein Most protein marketing leads with taste and price per gram. Both matter. But neither tells you whether the formula will support body composition outcomes over time. The two questions I'd ask before buying any protein powder are: what is the actual protein-to-calorie ratio, and what is the leucine content per serving.  Leucine is the branched-chain amino acid most directly linked to triggering muscle protein synthesis, and there is a threshold dose, roughly 2.5 to 3 grams per serving, below which the anabolic response is blunted. Many protein powders do not disclose this. They just list total protein and move on. The Lean Protein does not have this problem. The formula is transparent. The dose is evidence-based. One thing I'd ask you to consider: if you've never actually checked whether you're hitting your protein targets, try tracking it for three days. Most people find the gap is larger than they expected. If you're not sure which Innermost product fits your specific goal, the quiz on our site is a good place to start. Find the right protein for your goal   Read more
I've Been Taking The Glow Blend For Six Months. Here's What Happened
There's an uncomfortable truth about founders who sell supplements: most of us are too invested in our own products to give you an honest account of what they actually do. I want to try something different with this email. I’ve been taking The Glow Blend every day for six months. What follows is a genuine account of what I expected, what I noticed, what I wasn't sure about, and what I didn't notice at all. I'm telling you this partly because I think you deserve that level of honesty from the person who formulated the product, and partly because the honest account is actually more useful than a testimonial. What the evidence says before I get into my own experience Collagen is the most abundant protein in your body. It gives skin its structure and elasticity. From your mid-twenties, your body produces less of it each year. By the time most people start thinking about skin supplementation, they've already lost a meaningful amount. Hydrolysed collagen peptides, which is what's in The Glow Blend, are different from the collagen your body produces. They're pre-broken into smaller chains, which makes them bioavailable in a way whole collagen protein is not. When you consume them, they circulate in the bloodstream, where studies suggest they signal fibroblasts to produce more collagen. The mechanism is real. The research is there. The timeline The strongest evidence on collagen supplementation shows meaningful changes in skin elasticity and hydration typically at 6-8 weeks minimum, with more substantial effects at 10-12 weeks and beyond. Studies on nail growth and hair strength follow a similar curve. This is not a two-week product. Anyone selling you collagen on a 30-day challenge framework has either not read the research or has chosen to ignore it. Vitamin C as a co-factorVitamin C is not optional in this equation. It's essential for collagen synthesis at a cellular level. Without adequate vitamin C, your body cannot complete the process of building new collagen fibres regardless of how much collagen you're consuming. This is why The Glow Blend includes it, and why most budget collagen products either leave it out or include a token dose that doesn't meet the threshold. The Glow Blend also contains hyaluronic acid, which is a glycosaminoglycan that attracts and holds water within the skin. Biotin (B7) supports keratin production, which is the structural protein in hair and nails. Folic acid (B9) plays a role in cell regeneration. Each of these is in the formulation for a specific, evidence-based reason.  What I noticed and what I didn't I started in December. Six months ago. I'll be honest: December is a difficult month to start an experiment. My diet was inconsistent, my sleep was disrupted, and my skin was already taking a beating from dry air and a bit too much running around. I didn't expect to notice much quickly, and I didn't. By week six, my skin felt more comfortable. Not dramatically different. More comfortable is the right word. Less tight in the morning. Less reactive to changes in temperature. I noticed it most on long-haul flights, where my skin used to feel genuinely awful after landing and increasingly didn't.By month three, I think that my nails were growing a little faster mainly because I was cutting them more often. Whether that's the biotin, the collagen peptides, or the combination, I can't tell you, and the research doesn't give a clean answer either. I keep my nails short anyway, so my nails weren't the thing I was watching most closely (or noticed for that matter). What I was watching was my hair. I'm older now than when I launched Innermost, and density is something I'm acutely aware of. The Glow Blend contains biotin and folate, both of which support hair health, so this is where my attention went. Over these six months: a bit thicker, a bit more resilient. I keep my hair short, so I'm not pointing to length. It's the feel and the density. I'm not going to dress that up into something it isn't. I'll just say it's been one of the more encouraging parts of the experience, and at this stage that counts for a lot.Skin texture improved. This one is harder to quantify because it's subjective. But my skin looks better now than it did in December. Some of that is the improvement in light. Some of it is that I'm trying to sleep better. But I've taken enough data points over six months to think the supplement is contributing something real. Where most products fall short The collagen category is full of underdosed products. The research on skin elasticity uses doses of 2.5g to 10g of collagen peptides per serving. A significant proportion of products on the market deliver less than 1g under the assumption that customers won't check. The Glow Blend delivers 5g of hydrolysed collagen peptides per sachet, alongside the vitamin C that makes the process work. That's where the formulation sits relative to the evidence. It's not arbitrary. My honest recommendation If you're thinking about trying The Glow Blend, I'd say this: give it twelve weeks before you draw any conclusions. The evidence doesn't support a shorter timeline and neither does my personal experience. Take it consistently. The days you forget are the days the benefit doesn't accumulate. Read more