icon-account icon-glass

Popular Products

The Lean Protein
Whey protein powder for weight-loss.
The Energy Booster
Pre/intra-workout powder with BCAAs.

I've Been Taking Creatine Every Day For Six Years

30th March 2026

30th March 2026

By Shivraj Bassi

Something happens in March.

The people who started strong in January, the ones with the new routine, the new kit, the renewed sense of purpose, are now splitting into two groups. The ones who've lost momentum. And the ones asking sharper questions.

Not "what should I take?" but "what actually works?"

Creatine keeps coming up. And every time it does, I notice the same pattern: people either swear by it without really understanding why, or they assume it's something bodybuilders use and leave it alone.
I've been taking it every single day for six years. So let me tell you what I actually know.

Why I started
 
I didn't start taking creatine for the reasons most people assume.
 
I wasn't trying to get bigger. I was training consistently, eating well, and hitting a wall. That frustrating place where effort stops translating into progress. A friend with a sports science background told me creatine was the most researched supplement in existence. More peer-reviewed studies than almost anything else on the market.
 
That got my attention. So I started. And I kept going.
 
What I noticed

The first week, nothing dramatic. But over the following three to four weeks, something shifted. I could push a little harder. An extra rep. Slightly more on the bar. Training sessions that didn't end in the usual flat feeling of having nothing left.
 
Those are marginal gains. They don't feel significant in the moment. But they compound. Over months, they're the difference between a plateau and real, measurable progression.
 
The one time I stopped, about two years in, during a stretch of heavy travel where I got lazy about it, I felt the absence more than I expected. Not immediately. But within a few weeks, training felt duller. Less sharp. I put it back in and haven't looked back since.
 
I also noticed something I hadn't anticipated: my thinking felt clearer on the days I trained hard. I assumed it was the exercise. I later learned creatine may have had something to do with that too.
 
What creatine actually does

Most people think of creatine as a muscle supplement. That's not quite right.
 
What creatine does is help your body regenerate ATP, adenosine triphosphate, more efficiently. ATP is your cells' primary energy currency. It's what your muscles burn during intense effort. But it's also what your brain runs on.
 
Here's the mechanism: during high-intensity exercise, your body depletes ATP rapidly. Creatine stored in muscle tissue, in the form of phosphocreatine, allows you to replenish that ATP faster. That's why creatine consistently improves performance in short, explosive efforts: weightlifting, sprinting, high-intensity intervals.
 
But the same ATP recycling process happens in the brain. A growing body of research suggests creatine may support cognitive performance, particularly under conditions of stress or sleep deprivation. A 2021 study published in Scientific Reports found meaningful improvements in memory and cognitive function following supplementation. It's not a nootropic in the trending sense of the word. But the evidence is real, and it applies to more people than the gym crowd.
 
The effective dose is well established: 3 to 5 grams per day, taken consistently. No loading phase required. No cycling. Just daily consistency, and that's where most people go wrong.
 
What the industry does instead

Creatine monohydrate has been around for decades. That's a problem for brands that need something new to sell.
 
So new formats appear. Creatine HCL. Buffered creatine. Kre-Alkalyn. Creatine ethyl ester. Creatine gummies. Each one marketed as superior: faster absorbing, more bioavailable, easier on the stomach.
 
The evidence doesn't support it.
 
Multiple head-to-head comparisons, including a widely cited review in the Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, found no meaningful performance advantage for alternative creatine forms over monohydrate. In some cases, the alternatives perform worse per gram of active compound. In the case of creatine gummies, several brands including some very large ones have been shown not to contain the creatine concentrations they claim on the label.
 
What you actually want is simple: a clinically relevant dose of creatine monohydrate, taken every day. That's it.
 
What I use
 
The Power Booster is 100% pure creatine monohydrate, nothing added, nothing unnecessary. Five grams per serving, which sits right at the evidence-supported daily dose.
 
It's not complicated because it doesn't need to be. The science on creatine monohydrate is already settled. The job is just to take it consistently.
 
(If you have a friend still on the fence about creatine, forward this their way. It's one of those rare supplements where the evidence is clear enough to just recommend without caveats.)

Product Spotlight

Need Expert Advice?

Other Insights

The Protein Mistake That's Holding Back Your Results
I've written at length about creatine. I've written about collagen, electrolytes, the GLP-1 moment, even the science of sleep. But I've never written a personal email about protein. That's a strange omission for someone who built a brand that makes some pretty ground-breaking protein powders. So let me explain why, and then actually say the thing I've been avoiding. Protein is the most foundational supplement in the Innermost range. It's also the hardest subject for me to write about personally, because there's nothing surprising about it. Creatine had a story. Collagen had a story. Protein is well... protein. Everyone knows you should eat more of it. The mechanism is not a secret. Muscle protein synthesis, leucine threshold, net nitrogen balance. If you've been in the fitness space for more than a couple of years, you've read this before. And I think that's the problem. The familiarity makes people stop paying attention. Here's what I actually think about protein, after a decade of working in this space. Most people in their thirties and forties are under-consuming protein and don't know it. Not by a small amount. The gap between what most people eat and what the research supports for muscle maintenance and body composition outcomes is significant. Studies looking at optimal intake for adults prioritising body composition consistently point to between 1.6 and 2.2 grams per kilogram of bodyweight per day. Most people are eating somewhere between 0.8 and 1.2. The difference is not cosmetic. Adequate protein intake directly affects your ability to preserve muscle tissue during a caloric deficit. It supports recovery between sessions. It has a measurable effect on satiety, which means it influences total caloric intake downstream, not just at the point you consume it. There's a subtler point too, and this is the one I've come to think matters most: protein is the nutrient where consistency compounds most directly. The benefits of creatine saturate over time in a relatively predictable way. Collagen has a timeline that research measures in months. But protein's effect on body composition is essentially continuous. Every day you hit your target, you preserve something. Every day you don't, you lose a small amount of ground. Over a summer, that adds up. This is what I've observed personally, and it's backed by the research on muscle protein turnover. The people who maintain their body composition through summer are not, in my experience, the people who train harder during that period. Most of them train less. Their routines are disrupted. They're travelling. Their eating is less structured. The people who come back in September looking broadly the same as they left in June are the ones who kept their protein intake consistent. That's it. That's the variable. Why I take The Lean Protein I’ve been taking The Lean Protein the past few months for a straightforward reason: the protein-to-calorie ratio. Much like our other protein blends, each serving delivers over 30 grams of protein. The calorie count is low relative to that protein yield. When my training is consistent and my eating is structured, I don't think about this very much. But in the periods when those things are less reliable, that ratio becomes the thing that holds the rest together. The formula also includes acetyl-L-carnitine, inulin, pomegranate extract, and yerba mate. These aren't afterthoughts. Acetyl-L-carnitine has a research base in fat metabolism. Inulin supports satiety and gut function. The pomegranate extract is included for its antioxidant contribution to recovery. This means that the formula does more work per serving than a standard whey and just what I need going into summer. The thing the industry gets wrong about protein Most protein marketing leads with taste and price per gram. Both matter. But neither tells you whether the formula will support body composition outcomes over time. The two questions I'd ask before buying any protein powder are: what is the actual protein-to-calorie ratio, and what is the leucine content per serving.  Leucine is the branched-chain amino acid most directly linked to triggering muscle protein synthesis, and there is a threshold dose, roughly 2.5 to 3 grams per serving, below which the anabolic response is blunted. Many protein powders do not disclose this. They just list total protein and move on. The Lean Protein does not have this problem. The formula is transparent. The dose is evidence-based. One thing I'd ask you to consider: if you've never actually checked whether you're hitting your protein targets, try tracking it for three days. Most people find the gap is larger than they expected. If you're not sure which Innermost product fits your specific goal, the quiz on our site is a good place to start. Find the right protein for your goal   Read more
I've Been Taking The Glow Blend For Six Months. Here's What Happened
There's an uncomfortable truth about founders who sell supplements: most of us are too invested in our own products to give you an honest account of what they actually do. I want to try something different with this email. I’ve been taking The Glow Blend every day for six months. What follows is a genuine account of what I expected, what I noticed, what I wasn't sure about, and what I didn't notice at all. I'm telling you this partly because I think you deserve that level of honesty from the person who formulated the product, and partly because the honest account is actually more useful than a testimonial. What the evidence says before I get into my own experience Collagen is the most abundant protein in your body. It gives skin its structure and elasticity. From your mid-twenties, your body produces less of it each year. By the time most people start thinking about skin supplementation, they've already lost a meaningful amount. Hydrolysed collagen peptides, which is what's in The Glow Blend, are different from the collagen your body produces. They're pre-broken into smaller chains, which makes them bioavailable in a way whole collagen protein is not. When you consume them, they circulate in the bloodstream, where studies suggest they signal fibroblasts to produce more collagen. The mechanism is real. The research is there. The timeline The strongest evidence on collagen supplementation shows meaningful changes in skin elasticity and hydration typically at 6-8 weeks minimum, with more substantial effects at 10-12 weeks and beyond. Studies on nail growth and hair strength follow a similar curve. This is not a two-week product. Anyone selling you collagen on a 30-day challenge framework has either not read the research or has chosen to ignore it. Vitamin C as a co-factorVitamin C is not optional in this equation. It's essential for collagen synthesis at a cellular level. Without adequate vitamin C, your body cannot complete the process of building new collagen fibres regardless of how much collagen you're consuming. This is why The Glow Blend includes it, and why most budget collagen products either leave it out or include a token dose that doesn't meet the threshold. The Glow Blend also contains hyaluronic acid, which is a glycosaminoglycan that attracts and holds water within the skin. Biotin (B7) supports keratin production, which is the structural protein in hair and nails. Folic acid (B9) plays a role in cell regeneration. Each of these is in the formulation for a specific, evidence-based reason.  What I noticed and what I didn't I started in December. Six months ago. I'll be honest: December is a difficult month to start an experiment. My diet was inconsistent, my sleep was disrupted, and my skin was already taking a beating from dry air and a bit too much running around. I didn't expect to notice much quickly, and I didn't. By week six, my skin felt more comfortable. Not dramatically different. More comfortable is the right word. Less tight in the morning. Less reactive to changes in temperature. I noticed it most on long-haul flights, where my skin used to feel genuinely awful after landing and increasingly didn't.By month three, I think that my nails were growing a little faster mainly because I was cutting them more often. Whether that's the biotin, the collagen peptides, or the combination, I can't tell you, and the research doesn't give a clean answer either. I keep my nails short anyway, so my nails weren't the thing I was watching most closely (or noticed for that matter). What I was watching was my hair. I'm older now than when I launched Innermost, and density is something I'm acutely aware of. The Glow Blend contains biotin and folate, both of which support hair health, so this is where my attention went. Over these six months: a bit thicker, a bit more resilient. I keep my hair short, so I'm not pointing to length. It's the feel and the density. I'm not going to dress that up into something it isn't. I'll just say it's been one of the more encouraging parts of the experience, and at this stage that counts for a lot.Skin texture improved. This one is harder to quantify because it's subjective. But my skin looks better now than it did in December. Some of that is the improvement in light. Some of it is that I'm trying to sleep better. But I've taken enough data points over six months to think the supplement is contributing something real. Where most products fall short The collagen category is full of underdosed products. The research on skin elasticity uses doses of 2.5g to 10g of collagen peptides per serving. A significant proportion of products on the market deliver less than 1g under the assumption that customers won't check. The Glow Blend delivers 5g of hydrolysed collagen peptides per sachet, alongside the vitamin C that makes the process work. That's where the formulation sits relative to the evidence. It's not arbitrary. My honest recommendation If you're thinking about trying The Glow Blend, I'd say this: give it twelve weeks before you draw any conclusions. The evidence doesn't support a shorter timeline and neither does my personal experience. Take it consistently. The days you forget are the days the benefit doesn't accumulate. Read more