icon-account icon-glass

Popular Products

The Lean Protein
Whey protein powder for weight-loss.

Is Microdosing The Ultimate Mental Performance Hack?

13th August 2020

13th August 2020

By Caitlin Bell

Once associated with tie-dye clad, 1960s counterculture hippies, psychedelic drugs are beginning to move from the fringes of scientific study to the forefront of mainstream experimentation.

The magic of microdosing

A growing community of people across the globe are now taking ‘microdoses’ of drugs such as LSD, magic mushrooms and ketamine in order to feel more focused, creative, and present. Doses of these psychoactive substances (usually one-20th to one-tenth of a recreational dose) are too low to produce an intoxicating effect. Instead of participants experiencing the hallucinations we usually associate with psychoactive and psychedelic drugs, microdosing is reported to unlock a stream of performance-related benefits such as increased focus and concentration, enhanced creativity, reduced anxiety and depression, pain reduction, and improved mood.  


How did the microdosing trend start?

The trend began to gain momentum between 2010 and 2013 among Silicon Valley’s technology, engineering, and science professionals, who were searching for a way to boost their focus in order to churn out more code and think outside of the box. Past adopters of the trend include Apple founder Steve Jobs and Windows founder Bill Gates. And now, scientists are tapping into this new wave of wellness hacking in the hope of discovering magical solutions for a range of mental, physical and personal problems.

Thanks to widespread public anti-drug campaigns in the late 20th century, the conventional belief is that psychedelics exhaust your brain and are bad for your overall health. However, a swell of anecdotal reports from the last few years are beginning to suggest otherwise. Psychedelics have gained rapid popularity and media attention as a ‘performance hacker’, and a 2018 survey, in which a questionnaire was launched over several websites, revealed that the main motive for microdosing was, overwhelmingly, performance enhancement.

How does microdosing work?

Typically, a microdose is one-20th to one-tenth of a recreational dose. People will usually take this dosage every three to four days to avoid increased tolerance. However, the time spent microdosing is generally limited to around a month in order to prevent dependence or addiction.

The most commonly used psychedelics for microdosing are LSD and psilocybin (a naturally occurring substance found in magic mushrooms). With LSD, a little can go a long way. Microdosers usually cut up a ‘tab’ of acid on a piece of blotted paper, however it’s almost near impossible to cut up into uniform pieces, meaning the dosage will fluctuate slightly each time. To avoid this, others distil the LSD in liquid and extract equal measurements each time.


Magic mushrooms on the other hand can be eaten raw, dried, made into a tea, or taken as drops of liquid psilocybin. They’re a favourite of Silicon Valley tech types who love hunting for the next best thing that’s going to help them stay competitive, focused and driven. Earlier this year, as a testament to just how far the trend has come, Forbes reported that for $2,000 per month, you can even get your own “psychedelic-trip coach guru” who will “guide you through your mind-altering journey”.

Here’s a few other popular drugs that people use for microdosing:

  • Ketamine. Ketamine is usually used as a sedative, for maintaining anaesthesia. Some users report feeling a physical high and a decrease in physical sensation in the body. Many think it can ease anxiety and depression, and with larger doses, the anti-depressive effects can last up to a month.
  • Ayahuasca. This Amazonian plant mixture contains a psychoactive substance called DMT. It’s usually consumed in tea-form, and users say it increases sensitivity and openness, and decreases boundaries and defences.
  • DMT. This is the active hallucinogenic compound found in ayahuasca. It’s usually smoked in powder form or consumed in a brew. The effects of DMT set in very quickly, with users saying it brings you to a place of introspection, allowing you to be in the present moment.



Due to the illegal nature of psychedelic substances, people are mostly having to resort to experimenting within their own homes, playing with varying schedules and doses to find out what works best for them. Up until 2019, scientists were having to tap in to these personal, private trials to explore the subject further. However, at the start of 2019, Imperial College London launched the world’s first Centre for Psychedelics Research, a watershed moment for psychedelic science which has laid the groundwork for larger trials taking place around the world, bringing a fringe of medical research into the centre of focus. As another example, in January this year, New Zealand’s Ministry of Health approved the world’s first randomized, controlled trial on LSD microdosing.

So, myth or magic? These drugs are now just as much the subject of authorised medical trials as they are a quick productivity hack for Google execs. Let’s break down the reported benefits and drawbacks of this new phenomenon.

Advantages of microdosing:

Those who have tried and tested microdosing, and experienced only positive effects, have reported the following:

  • The flow state (the feeling of being “in the zone”).
  • Reduced anxiety and stress.
  • Improved mental health.
  • Enhanced creativity.
  • Optimism and boosted mood.
  • Superior body functioning.
  • Enjoyment in being able to control the dose.
  • Being able to quit other habits.

Disadvantages of microdosing:

Psychoactive substances don’t have the same effect on all who take them. In fact, some users might be overly sensitive to certain drugs and have bad reactions. These people have reported the following effects:

  • Reduced energy levels.
  • Lower mood.
  • Increased anxiety and stress.
  • Poor focus.
  • Feeling agitated and/or uncomfortable.
  • Worsened mental health.
  • Dizziness and nausea.
  • No different to a placebo.

Ultimately, much more research needs to be done in order to properly explore and assess the power and potential of hallucinogens. Evidence for its beneficial effects on everyday life is mostly anecdotal, and so there’s a pressing need for standardized, placebo-controlled studies to answer the wealth of questions at hand. Scientific evidence about the potential negative effects is also lacking and more needs to be done to avoid the possibly damaging impacts of improper drug use. Naturally, this is almost always complicated by the legal issues surrounding psychedelic substances, making it difficult for scientists to obtain access for research.

The hack to superhuman mind powers may be found in future trials, but for now we may have to resort to practising meditation and mindfulness to stay on our mental A-game. What do you think about the microdosing trend? Let us know in the comments below.

Need Expert Advice?

Other Insights

What Happened To My Training Over Summer (Honestly)
I did not train well this summer. A holiday to spend time with my family, a run of work trips, a couple of injuries I was trying to cope with (left shoulder and right forearm for those who are interested). If you'd asked me in June how consistent I'd be over the summer, I'd have said very. I was wrong. Most people quietly assume the founder of a wellness brand has this figured out. The truth is I run a brand, I try to have a life outside it, and summer is the season where routine goes to die for almost everyone I know. I don't think that's a personal failing. I think it's just what a normal year looks like. What I want to talk about is what actually happens to your body when this happens, because the research here is more reassuring than you might expect. What detraining research actually shows There's a real body of science on this. Strength and cardiovascular fitness don't decline at the same rate, and they don't decline anywhere near as fast as people fear. Cardiovascular fitness is the first thing to soften. Your VO2 max starts drifting down within a couple of weeks of stopping structured training, because your heart and blood vessels adapt to demand quickly in both directions. Strength is a different story. Studies that track people through a few weeks off training consistently find that measurable strength loss is small, often barely noticeable, for the first three to four weeks. The muscle itself takes even longer to shrink in any meaningful way. Several studies looking specifically at detraining periods found that visible loss of muscle protein and structure often doesn't show up until somewhere between five and eight months without any training at all. A summer of patchy sessions is nowhere near that. The reassuring partThe part I find genuinely reassuring is what's called muscle memory, and it's not just a phrase people use to feel better about a break. When you train, your muscle cells add nuclei, essentially more control centres for building protein. Research shows those nuclei stick around for months after you stop training, well past the point where the muscle itself has started to shrink. When you come back, you're not starting from zero. You're reactivating machinery that never actually left. That's a large part of why people who return to training after a long break tend to regain lost strength and size far faster than it took to build in the first place, often within four to eight weeks depending on how long the layoff was. Some of you might remember this happening post-Covid. So if you had a summer like mine, the honest scientific answer is that you probably lost less than it feels like, and you'll get it back faster than you think. What I'm actually doing this month Nothing dramatic. I'm not doing a reset week or a punishing comeback programme. I'm just going back to five structured sessions a week, prioritising the compound lifts I know well, and being honest that the first couple of sessions will feel harder than they did in June.  Don’t forget your proteinThe other thing I'm paying more attention to is protein, simply because it's the one lever that makes the rebuilding phase more efficient. Adequate protein intake supports the muscle protein synthesis that's doing the actual work of restoring what softened over summer. I've been leaning on The Health Protein for this. It's plant-based, built around pea and brown rice protein for a full amino acid profile, with glutamine in there to support recovery. If you'd rather stick with a whey based option, that's a completely reasonable choice too, and The Strong Protein remains built for exactly that. If you had a messy summer, you're not behind. You're just at the start of a normal, unremarkable return to routine, and the research says that's a far shorter road back than most people assume. Forward this to anyonre you know who is dreading their first session back. I'd genuinely like to know what generally works for you post-summer. Structured plan, just showing up once, anything. Reply and tell me. Even if it’s a one-liner, I’d love to hear from you. Read more
The Glow Blend: A Confession
I need to tell you something I've never said publicly, and it's not flattering. When our product team first brought me a plan for a collagen supplement, my honest reaction was no. Not "let me think about it." A flat no. And if I'm being fully honest about why, it wasn't the science. It was that collagen felt, in my head, like a beauty category. Something for someone else's brand. Not ours. I built Innermost around performance and evidence. Protein, creatine, mushrooms, electrolytes. Things I could point to a study for and feel comfortable talking about at a dinner table full of people who workout regularly. Collagen sat in a different mental folder. Skincare aisle. Jars with gold lids and brand sponsorship by one of the Kardashians. I'd absorbed a version of what "beauty" meant without ever examining it. The argument in the room So we had the argument internally. A proper one. A few people on the team pushed back hard, and rightly so. One of them put it to me plainly: we started Innermost to follow the evidence wherever it goes, not to follow it everywhere except the places that feel awkward. That line stuck with me. Here's what changed my mind, and it wasn't a feeling. It was the research. What the evidence actually says Collagen is the most abundant protein in your body. It's structural, it's in your skin, your joints, your gut lining, and production declines steadily from your mid-twenties onward. That's not a marketing claim, that's basic physiology. The question was never whether collagen matters. It was whether supplementing it actually does anything, and that's where most of the category falls apart. Most collagen products on the market use whole collagen molecules, which are too large to be absorbed effectively when you drink them. The ones that do use hydrolysed peptides, which are broken down into smaller chains your body can actually take up, still run into a second problem: dose. A lot of labels list collagen content that sits well below the 2 to 10 grams used in the trials that show measurable effects on skin elasticity and hydration. You're paying for a placebo with good branding. The ingredient most brands leave out The third problem is the one that convinced me completely. Vitamin C isn't a nice-to-have alongside collagen. It's a required co-factor for your body to actually synthesise collagen at the cellular level. Without adequate vitamin C, the enzymes responsible for stabilising collagen structure don't function properly. You can take a perfectly dosed hydrolysed peptide and still get a fraction of the benefit if the product doesn't include enough vitamin C alongside it. Most don't. They sell you the raw material and leave out the one thing your body needs to use it. Once I saw the category clearly, laid out like that, the decision stopped being about how I felt and started being about what the evidence supported. That's the whole operating principle of Innermost. I couldn't defend saying no to a legitimate, well-evidenced product category. What we built So we built The Glow Blend properly. Hydrolysed collagen peptides at a dose that reflects the research, alongside vitamin C, hyaluronic acid for hydration, biotin and folic acid for hair and nail health. Nothing in it that doesn't earn its place. What surprised me after launch The part I didn't expect was the response once we launched it. A good number of the messages came from women, as you'd expect, and they were generous and specific about what they'd noticed. But a surprising number came from men. Customers writing in to say they'd felt exactly what I'd felt, that awkward little flinch at "collagen," and had quietly bought it anyway because the ingredient breakdown made sense to them. That response told me more about why this category needed an honest voice in it than any research paper did. I'm not going to pretend I have this fully figured out. I still catch myself, occasionally, hesitating slightly before I mention it in a room. Old habits sit deeper than good evidence sometimes. But I take it, and increasingly a lot of men I respect take it too, quietly, without needing to make a thing of it. If this sounds familiar If any part of this resonated, and you've felt that same small resistance to a category you assumed wasn't for you, hit reply and tell me. I'd genuinely like to know I'm not the only one who had to get over it. And if you know someone, a friend, a partner, who could use this exact reasoning rather than a tesimonial, forward it on. It might do more good coming from someone else's honesty. Read more